Who Should You Vote For on May 10?

The ones you should vote for on May 10 are the ones whom you think will fulfill their roles the best. Not the one “most likely to win”. Not “the one most likely to defeat so-and-so.” Not “the lesser evil”.

After all the discussions, debates, the volatile roller-coaster ride of survey and poll results, the political smearing and candidate-bashing… ultimately, here’s what I’ve realized over the weekend:

One. Don’t trust surveys. I fell for it last week. But here’s some truth: when FVR ran for President in 1992, he was only #5 in the polls survey. So if you’re just ‘settling’ for a candidate just because you think he has a better chance of winning (thereby defeating the ‘lesser evil’) … think again. I have.

Two. Don’t vote based on personality alone. That would be like hiring an employee just because he/she seems nice and seems to have a nice personality. When you hire an employee, of course personality is a big factor. But it’s not enough. You evaluate skill, track record, capability and look at achievements… as well as personality. And the same is true for the reverse. See, they go hand in hand. You can’t have one without the other.

Three. Take time to study. Before even getting to know your candidates, get to know your country. Your government. The role of your President and Vice-President. What your Senators are for. What your Congressmen, Mayors, Councilors are for. What the point of voting for a Party List is. Get to know the issues. So you also get to figure out for yourself what problems need to be solved first, and how one problem affects all our other problems. And then review your candidates’ platforms. Find out what solutions they have in mind to address the most pressing problems. And then judge for yourself if you believe in the policies and platform of your candidate.

Four. The Other Government Seats are equally as important as the Presidential Seat. The Vice-President succeeds the President if for whatever reason, he cannot continue his term. Senators legislate and decide on laws that affect you and me in ways we may not even realize yet. So does the Congress. Mayors decide if the city you live in will be prepared if the next Typhoon Ondoy strikes. Councilors can help you fix your backyard; arrest neighborhood addicts and commend honorable Barangay Tanods. All of them have a reason for being. So yes, they are just as important as the President of the country.

And finally, five. Don’t allow yourself to be influenced by what others say. Listen, of course. Take it in stride and a grain of salt. Some things you hear on TV and from the lips of your family and friends may be true, but may not be true as well. Details matter, but in the greater scheme of things, they don’t matter as much as the big picture. No one’s perfect. The question is: in your point of view, who is the better man/woman qualified to do the job properly?

As Election Day draws closer, and anxiety continues to build all around, and speculations of cheating, failure of elections and whatnots abound; from ordinary voting citizens like us, what we need to do is to pause for a moment, and really reflect on the choices we will make on May 10.

I’ve come across some nice, non-partisan and unbiased articles that could help you when you reflect. Cheers!

How Presidentiables Plan to Generate Jobs

The Presidentiables’ Stand on Education

The Presidentiables’ Platforms

The Presidentiables’ Stand on Population Control

Get to Know Your Vice Presidentiables

The Buzz About the Senatorial Candidates. I have yet to find a site that compiles the list and profile of all the senatorial candidates (I suppose that would really be far too much), so instead I’m taking you to a forum where people discuss different senatorial candidates. Maybe you can pick up a thing or two here about them.

Refresher Course on Philippine Government Structure

Understanding the Partylist System. This is something new I forced myself to learn today.

Advertisements

Erap Ties Villar for 2nd Place!

Yegadz!!!!

Unbelievable!

This latest piece of news just might actually push me to vote for Noy. *groan* Funny how one’s perspective can shift so drastically, so quickly.

Before I saw this on the news last night, voting for Noy was not even close to being an option. It was either Dick or Gibo. Or, if I had allowed pragmatism to more heavily influence my decision-making process, perhaps Manny Villar as a ‘lesser evil’.

Come to think of it, I think vacillating and delaying the inevitable final decision on who to vote signifies many things. The fact that there’s no perfect candidate. The fact that all of them have things that work for and against them. The fact that it really entails a long-drawn-out decision-making process to arrive at a satisfying choice.

Beyond those obvious things, what is remarkable is that before this new piece of news, vacillating was actually still an option. When the Presidential seat seemed to be unmistakably waiting for just either Noy or Villar, while it inspired heated debates and rising tempers – we all knew (I think) at the back of our minds that either way, it wouldn’t be such a bad thing. Or to be more succinct about it – Noy or Villar as President wouldn’t be unacceptable.

With Erap back in the race with a strong fighting chance, therein lies the most unacceptable event of all: that he wins back the Presidential seat. It’s no different from the 2004 Elections when it was clearly just a race between GMA and FPJ.

Yegadz!!! And to think there were rumors a few weeks ago that a few days before the Elections, Erap will suddenly pull out of the race and endorse all his supporters to vote for Villar instead.

Well… that’s not an impossibility yet at this point, of course. Our political arena is as we already know, very much akin to an arena filled with circus freaks.

So here we are, 2 weeks before the elections and it seems like much is changing. If Erap continues his climb up the Presidential race, it’s a no brainer that Noy is without a doubt, the better choice.

So much for voting without  compromising.

Which Presidentiable Gets My Vote?

The National Elections is less than 15 days away, and I still haven’t decided on which Presidentiable I’m supporting.

According to the latest surveys, Noy leads the race with a close to 10-point gap to the 2nd placer, Manny Villar. Erap (not included in the photo for fairly obvious reasons) is a far number 3; Gibo not far behind Erap at #4; and Dick Gordon a far far number 5. Statistically, Gordon is tied with Nick Perlas and (I think) Jamby Madrigal at only 2% each.

Over the past few months, I’ve come across people who like me, think that the best Presidential candidate is actually Dick Gordon. Track record alone speaks about the capabilities of this man – from Subic, Red Cross and the DOT – he has undoubtedly shown results. However, most of us choose not to vote for him only because we all believe he has no chance of winning. In many ways, it feels like voting for Dick would be a wasted vote – if only we could reallocate that vote for the lesser evil of the top 2 candidates. I remember remarking on this in one of my past blogs early on in the Presidential campaigning period too.

It’s a bit sad though how collective minds think this way. Consider the alternative. If everyone who actually thinks and believes that Dick Gordon is the best Presidential candidate… actually went ahead and rallied for him – then maybe he could actually win. Or at least have a fighting chance.

So the question remains to many ‘undecideds’ like me:

Will I vote according to the dictates of my conscience, in which case that would be Dick?

Or should I just vote pragmatically, and help the “lesser evil” have a better fighting chance (in which case, I am still undecided who is actually the ‘lesser evil’)?

This year’s Election period started out with a very positive and hopeful collective spirit.

Except for the few apathetic, indifferent citizens of this country who don’t really care one way or the other about the Elections or anything related to governing this country — most others I spoke to about this year’s elections really seemed to genuinely care. People have actually gone out of their way to educate themselves and go through lengths to really understand the issues, get to know the candidates and scrutinize the situation from every angle. It has made for a lot of interesting discussions and friendly-but-somewhat-heated debates over coffee and alcohol here and there.

But it was genuinely nice seeing people rise up and have their say on how they think this country should be run. Whether or not we were all of a shared belief didn’t matter. What mattered was that people started to care. And that everyone seemed hell-bent on making the right and the best decisions for the country. (For the first time ever, it’s no longer a guarantee that a celebrity wins in the Elections! A huge leap for the Filipino voting population.)

While it’s still true today, what is frustrating is how now, at the 11th hour, most of us are left with no choice but to somehow make yet another compromise on something that should be worth keeping our conviction for. Why is it that we’re ultimately always left with the question of who is the lesser evil?

We actually have a very well qualified Presidentiable who unfortunately lacks machinery and funding support, hence he lags far, far behind in the polls.

Instead, the top candidates we have are found wanting on many levels.

Noynoy

I’ve made my thoughts about Noynoy clear in a previous blog entry. Earlier today I read an article written by a Gordon-believer-but-Noynoy-supporter (again because of the assumption that Dick won’t win), and in it, she says that she will just vote for Noynoy because he is the only one who can be trusted. That his “quietness” as a Senator is because he doesn’t seek the limelight. Personally, that feels like a stretch at rationalizing and excusing inaction.

‘Not seeking the limelight’ is a description that doesn’t apply to a Senator. By default, and by simple job description alone – a public official will always be in the limelight. What’s glaring under ‘this limelight of his’ is that the years he’s spent in the Senate hasn’t amounted to anything significant in his list of accomplishments. And really now, what does exactly does ‘proper enforcement of the law’ mean? If this was his thrust all these years, laws today are still not properly enforced.

And what exactly does he also mean when he says ‘we have more than enough laws’? We don’t even have laws yet that protect the general public from medical malpractices. Here’s something I picked up recently: no doctor in the Philippines has ever been disbarred nor had his/her medical license revoked in spite of proven medical malpractices. At most, they only get suspended. That’s because there are no governing laws that mandate juridical actions by the country’s governing bodies for the medical community.

See…. Trustworthiness is an admirable quality. But we don’t need just an administration whose strengths are solely hinged on their trustwortiness. We need an administration who can act, rise out of complacency and not be content with just ‘what we already have’.

Villar

Now this guy, his rags-to-riches story and how today he is one of the richest men in the country… for someone like me, stubbornly self-driven to achieve all my goals all on my own regardless of what it takes…it is an admirable, inspiring story.

I can turn a blind eye on the misleading details of his past and how everyone now questions whether his claims in his commercials are anywhere near true. He is dishonest and untrustworthy, many will say and have said. The exact opposite of Noynoy.

But man, can he act and make a tangible difference. His platform and policies are a tad bit more aggressive. Controversial too, if you push the thinking even more.

He has a strong propensity for tolerating corruption. Not just tolerating it, but actually being one of the forerunners of a corrupt administration.

Yes. These are our Top 2 Presidentiables. Who is the lesser evil? Beyond personality alone, will you choose an administration who will champion the fight against corruption? Or the administration who is launching an all-out war against poverty? Both are noble aspirations. But which one… which one will really make a difference for the Filipino people?

And also, at the end of it all, will you vote according to the dictates of your conscience? Or vote while turning a blind eye and only half a heart?

Tears for Fears in Manila!

While my giddy female classmates would scream and swoon for Robi da Rosa or Ricky Martin at the height of the band Menudo‘s popularity some time ago in the 80s, I…. I rocked to the tunes of Ronald Orzabal and Curt Smith, singing “Everybody Wants to Rule the World” at the top of my lungs.

While schoolgirls got reeled in to the boy-ish good looks of the band who started all boy bands, I angsty-ly sniffled away a few tears to “Memories Fade”, “Start of the Breakdown” and “The Working Hour” (don’t ask me why I cried to this song, I don’t quite know myself).

And… while my female counterparts would memorize the dance steps of “Heavenly Angels”…. I bobbed my head to the unique percussions of “Mad World”; while pretending to understand the meaning of the song “Pale Shelter”.

You know what I’m talking about, dontcha?

I am a big fan. This duo took center stage in my life when I was still a confused, trying-hard-to-fit-in adolescent who already apparently already showed hints of senseless rebellion.

And as an adult, I still take the lyrics of “Advice for the Young at Heart” to heart. “Woman in Chains” is a regular in all my favorite playlists. I still feel a slight shiver when the opening bars of “Everybody Loves a Happy Ending” starts.

Tears for Fears. *shiver*

If you’re as big a fan as I am, then you’d have known long ago — they’re coming to Manila! May 2nd, Araneta Coliseum!

We’ve got our tickets ready and waiting. This is gonna so rule my world.

If you’re as big a fan as I am, see you there!

—-

P.S. If you want to find out about where to get tickets, just click on the photo.

The Aquino Legacy

There are only very few Filipinos whose spirits do not feel a lift when the subject of Ninoy and Cory Aquino comes into discussion. If there was ever a couple most loved in Philippine History, it would be this yellow-bearing, unassuming yet very charismatic couple.

The Aquino legacy began with Benigno “Ninoy” Aquino, most visible and influential at the peak of ex-President Ferdinand Marcos’ era of dictatorship and tyranny.

I was too young to remember what life in the Philippines was like at this time. My brother and I are children born in the peak of Martial Law. Apart from witnessing (although never really comprehending) heated discussions over the dinner table as our parents (who were pro-Aquino) would launch into verbal combat with my Grandfather (a die-hard Marcos loyalist), my concept of Martial Law and living under a dictator’s rule was much like a baby trying to comprehend the funny sounds adults make when ooooh-ing and aaaaahh-ing over the crib.

What I do clearly remember is that fateful day on the 21st of August, 1983. The day when Ninoy Aquino, after being exiled from the Philippines for many years, finally returned home to continue challenging the tyrannical rule of President Marcos.

We already know what happens on this day. As he alights from the plane, he gets shot and dies on the spot — there, on the tarmac of what is now known as the Ninoy Aquino International Airport.

Several days later, millions of Filipinos gather on the streets to mourn and bury their hero. I remember this – mom was watching this on TV. She was very sad. If I recall correctly, she was on the phone with my maternal grandmother and they were together mourning the death of Ninoy Aquino.

The next big Chapter of the Aquino saga came a few years later. I was 10 years old — still ignorant and clueless about the ongoings of a country slowly dying under the weight of a relentless dictator. And yet, my memories of this time are just a little bit clearer.

The events that led up to the final toppling of the Dictator on February 25, 1986 paralleled some little events here and there that were happening in our own household. I remember mom and dad suddenly shuffling me and kuya home on the night of February 22 (that was a Sunday… we usually spent weekends with my maternal Grandparents in Paranaque).

You see, my childhood home (and my paternal grandparents’ ancestral home) is located in San Juan. It’s 5 minutes away from EDSA-Ortigas, 10 minutes away from Camps Crame and Aguinaldo. I still wonder to this day why instead of leaving us safely tucked away far from where all the happenings were, mom and dad brought us closer to the center of action.

But I digress. That night, after seeing us safely tucked away in our beds, mom and dad (with my uncle) left the house and didn’t return til the following day. They came home just to get bathed, dress up, eat, and then they left again. This went on for the next two days.

And on the third day, mom and dad went home, exhausted but happy and jubilant. They dressed my brother and I in yellow clothes, and took us to EDSA where millions of yellow-bearing Filipinos were singing, dancing and crying with joy. Marcos was gone. Corazon “Cory” C. Aquino was finally the rightful President of the Philippines, and she has just given us back the freedom that Marcos took from everyone years ago. Democracy was back.

Two years ago (August 2008) we commemorated the 25th Death Anniversary of Ninoy. And a year later (August 2009), we mourned the Death of his widow, Cory.

Apart from being such strong historical figures in our country, these 2 are also special to me on a personal level. On his 25th Death Anniversary, I worked on a youth-driven advocacy program to help advocate the values that Ninoy lived by among the youth of today. His values of courage, integrity, honesty and resilience.

Through this campaign, I had been able to get close to some members of the family. We would be invited to watch plays, read scripts, and meet with other interest groups who wanted to sign in to this advocacy. We even had long discussions about the current political scenario. About GMA. Sometimes we would share opposing views. But of course, since they were still my Clients, I couldn’t stray too far and reveal some of my more intense points of view.

I take pride in fact in being able to say that at one point of my life, I met Cory Aquino face to face. I didn’t get to shake her hands – since she was battling Cancer, she needed to exercise caution when meeting with people who’ve been outdoors. But we did take a picture with  her for posterity’s sake. I’ve got it safely stored among my most valued possessions.

On her death on August 2nd, 2009, I had the privilege of attending one of her funeral masses.

I will never forget too the sentiments I had when I met Cory face to face. She is an awe-inspiring woman. She is… was… a very strong woman. Not loud, not abrasive, not rough. But strong, in her own quiet, resilient way. She could speak volumes in spite of her mild-mannered bearing. She was firm, decisive and authoritative…. and yet, infinitely gentle.  How one woman could possess that contrast of qualities is amazing.

That’s my memory of Cory: a strong, capable, intelligent and trustworthy woman with unparalleled integrity. The world lost a great woman upon her death. But it was time for her to rejoin her love, the man whose ideals she did not allow to die along with him.

In their respective time frames, Ninoy and Cory were heroes in their own right.

Ninoy’s persistent fight from Senate, to his squalid prison cell, to his hospital bed and his brief sojourn into family life as an exile in Boston – he never stopped speaking up against the ills of the Marcos regime. All this at the cost of his own life. He fought til his last breath, and spurred a people starving for a hero into action.

And to continue his fight, his widow. The one who united a people into a peaceful revolution that would once and for all overthrow a dictatorship and restore democracy to a nation down on its knees.

The freedom that we enjoy today we can attribute largely to the Ninoy and Cory Aquino legacy. And while there’s so much more progress to achieve and societal ills to battle, at their time, they did what they needed to do, and did it well.

With the death of this enigmatic, charismatic couple comes the new generation of Aquinos to leave their mark in Philippine History.

My generation of Aquinos.

Where do we begin?

Let me see… should I start with the controversial showbiz sensation that is Kris Aquino? TV host, actress, daughter of Ninoy and Cory, wife of basketball star James Yap, sister of Presidential candidate Noynoy Aquino. Well, that’s not even worth writing a long paragraph about.

So I’ll move on to current Presidential candidate, Noynoy Aquino. Leader of the Liberal Party. Senator for several terms, but not clearly associated with the formulation or revision of any bills or legislatures. Known by many of his supporters as the only guy in the current Presidential roster who has a squeaky clean record.

I wager that his popularity now is brought about in many ways by the legacy left behind by his parents. Sure, he’s pretty well known, but truthfully his past record is unremarkable. Especially if you compare it against the history-forming efforts of his parents.

And it makes one wonder.

One would hope that the offspring of the famous couple would likewise carry the torch of his parents and truly make a difference.

But what does making a difference in this day and age really mean?

If it means speaking up against corruption and making a stand in cleaning the government of corrupt officials… and an economic policy that’s hinged on an idealistic and conservative belief system that’s more suited for times past… frankly, it feels to me no different from the outdated ideals preached by the Catholic Church that fail to contextualize religious edicts and sermons against real and present day scenarios and all the things that people face on a regular basis.

There’s nothing wrong with that, nothing wrong with forcing moral ascendancy. Who doesn’t admire people with values and morals?

But how much of a change will that create? The Philippines has continuously been sinking deeper and deeper in poverty year on year. Peace in Mindanao continues to be elusive. Literacy rate drops as the years go by. Health conditions and environmental conditions continue to deteriorate. How many more Administrations can we survive before we’re driven to the brink of desperation?

Many say they’re choosing to support and vote Noynoy in this coming Elections because among the candidates, he’s the only one who’s “clean”.

The trouble with people with a squeaky clean image is sometimes you wonder how far they’re willing to go to get their hands dirty. And do note: “dirty” doesn’t mean immoral or unlawful. Simply — making unpopular (sometimes controversial) decisions that often spell the difference between progress and regression.

Sure, I’d love to have a President who’s got his values screwed on right. But if it’s at the expense of the (potentially) controversial but necessary acts for the greater good of the country’s citizens, maybe I’ll just choose the candidate whose reputation may be questionable, but who will get the results we desperately need to rise above our problems.

At the end of this long monologue, I have no conclusions to draw. I have more questions than ever. As for Noynoy – if he becomes President, I wonder. What kind of legacy will this new Aquino leave behind?

The Dimunitive President

In the news last night, the Comelec made it official that there are absolutely no legal impediments to President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo’s bid for the Congress in the coming Elections. Much to the chagrin of many, I’m sure.

I have no opinion yet about the possibility of GMA becoming the Speaker of the House someday. It all boils down to results, after all. And at this point, it’s all speculation. She hasn’t won yet.

I do have much sympathy for this dimunitive little woman. She is undoubtedly one of the most controversial, and perhaps one of the most criticized Presidents in the History of the Philippines. I think she would rank a close second to the Dictator Ferdinand Marcos.

But personally, I’ve always admired this woman.

She may be many things, and may be called many ugly names in the book.

But she has strength of character and guts of steel. She has enough of that to be able to withstand the barrage of threats, calls for resignation, impeachment hearings while warding off terrorist threats, dealing with national calamities and finding ways to go around economic recessions. And there’s also everything else in between. Even her boob job several years ago gets the front page news. If she even had so much as a tiny zit on her forehead, I’m perfectly sure she would be tonight’s headline once again.

It’s not too different from Barrack Obama’s trip to the burger joint within a few months into his Presidency. The poor man can’t even get a burger without pictures of it getting splashed all over the front pages. It’s not a stretch to say that people like Obama and GMA have their entire lives under constant scrutiny. And heck, no one’s perfect. It’s all far easy too to twist the truth or skew it even just a little bit to  suit the conclusions that people want to make.

Bottomline: the country’s problems can’t be solved by one person. Nor can they be solved by a ten-year term in office. Our problems began long before you and I even existed. If we take a look at History, every administration was riddled with its own set of problems. Every President has his/her own legacy to speak of.

I’ve always felt that the sickness of our political system is the fact that our politicians spend more time scrutinizing the mistakes of every person in office and publicly criticizing every move they make…. rather than spending valued time doing something real and concrete to try finding solutions to the country’s problems. If there’s anyone at fault for why we haven’t risen to the levels of our other ASEAN counterparts, then take a stab at deconstructing then rebuilding our political culture.

The dimunitive President may be many things. But she is a woman of action.

The Reproductive Health Bill

This is the story of the controversial bill, which provides for universal access to information to empower women to take charge of their reproductive health. It covers provisions to arm women with information on family planning, sexual health, and providing sex education for teens, among other things.

This bill is being opposed by the Catholic Church with the presupposition that providing universal information to people will further encourage church-prohibited acts, i.e. pre-marital sex. And heaven forbid, sex (among married couples) for pleasure rather than procreation.

This (to me) is just another indication of how outdated the Catholic Church is on their policies and restrictions. While their role is to supposedly safeguard the spiritual growth of its constituents, they do so in context of old beliefs and a time long ago when the world was simpler.

The world today is so different from the world as it used to be.

This is not to say that the Church should relax its standards on morals and personal values. But would it be such a bad thing to adjust their principles and beliefs on the basis of what is more real to the world today?

To put it plainly and simply…

Teens today are having pre-marital sex. They will keep having pre-marital sex, whether we like it or not. Teens today, compared to teens during my time (I was born in the mid-70s), engage not only in pre-marital sex… but even casual sex.

Personally, I’ve always felt uncomfortable with the emerging lifestyle of the generations after mine.

Nowadays, I see the younger girls in my office going on a night out with skirts shorter than my shortest pair of shorts… matched with 4-inch heels and heavy make-up (and these are girls in their 20s, they aren’t 14). I jokingly tell them “if I were your mother, I wouldn’t let you out of the house dressed in that.” — and coming from me, that’s a lot. Anyone who knows me knows I’m not a prude. I used to wear skimpy clothes too in my younger years… but compared to my standards of “skimpy” back then, my outfits in my younger years were still conservative compared to today’s standards.

A few weeks ago, I watched a feature on TV about this. It was an investigative show that studied the behavior and attitude of teens regarding sex today.

In the show, a young teen couple was featured. They were both 14 years old and had been dating for just a few months. At 14 years old and just a few months into their “steady relationship”, they were already sexually active.

The show also featured anonymous interviews with teen girls and boys who had multiple sex partners. And if that’s not enough, casual sex is something they don’t hesitate to engage in as well. Their motivation? Because it’s “what’s in today”. It’s what “most of my friends do”. Most of them don’t take precautions because they don’t think they need it.

It’s a far cry from my teenage years.

In fact, I remember being 21 years old, a fresh grad from College in genuine shock when I found out some my closest girl friends lost their virginity when they were still in College. At that age, the thought was unthinkable for me to even think about risking having sex when I was still a student. At the very least, I knew enough to wait until I was old enough to support myself if a bundle of joy and diapers suddenly emerged from an intimate encounter.

If the thought of boys and girls whom I knew engaging in sex at 18, 19 years old already shocked me… imagine my greater shock contemplating the thought of 14-year old girls just casually having casual sex!

So yes, I too am affected by the drastic change in society today.

And that’s why (it’s no shock)…. I am fully supportive of the Reproductive Health Bill.

Frankly, I think most kids are not aware of the repercussions of their actions. Some kids still think having sex just once can’t get a girl pregnant. Some kids don’t even think about sexually transmitted diseases, nor consider the possibility that it could happen to them.

So providing universal information, while it would not encourage complete abstinence, would at least arm them with the information to take precautions. The best thing we can even hope for… is that a handful of kids are actually brought to their senses and decide to stop whatever they’re doing (or planning to do), being mindful now of the repercussions of their actions.

And then, there are also those adult couples who have no current access to information. The married ones who don’t exercise family planning, so they end up with 5, 10 kids to feed. Sadly, most of them live within the poverty line who can’t even feed themselves three full meals a day. A little information and access to counseling and family planning methods would greatly them.

Now, with all of this… here’s what I’m wondering.

While I know that they have an obligation to safeguard the country’s spiritual growth… doesn’t the Church also have the obligation to confront and address the world in context of what it is today, and to provide moral and spiritual guidance in context of all of this?

To stop the Reproductive Health Bill will not stop young people or married couples from having sex. If  parents can’t even stop their own kids, how can the Catholic Church expect to stop millions of young people from doing what they want to do simply because they say so?

Perhaps they are hoping that by overtly opposing  this bill they are able to take a solid moral stand… but in context of this bill, that’s just like… well, it’s like doing nothing.

Its almost like just letting teen pregnancies continue. Allowing poor families to keep having more and more kids, more kids whom parents can’t even feed nor send to school properly. Allowing young men and women to acquire sexually transmitted diseases… sometimes potentially fatal diseases.

It’s mind-boggling.

This is just another one of the many reasons why I’ve felt so disconnected to this same religion that was instilled in me since I was a little girl. As an adult, going to Church would always remind me that there’s a vengeful, judgmental God who frowns down on me and all my sins and imperfections. The priests in homilies made sure we always kept that in mind. They talk down on their parishioners and preach endlessly about dogmatic issues that we must strictly follow, or else suffer the fires of hell.

This works in a black and white world. But we all exist, all of us, in shades of gray where morality is ambiguous at best. So tell me. In a world of gray, where does the Reproductive Health Bill stand?

Oh, by the way, there are also a lot of civil rights and church-activist groups opposing this bill. The only thing I can say there is — if you can propose a better solution to protect people from the repercussions of irresponsible sex (when you all know deep in your hearts that this will keep happening no matter what anyone says or does), then by all means, do share.

Reproductive Health Bill Resources: The Reproductive Health Bill, Wiki’s simplified definition.